Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCSSX vs PMBPX
LCSSX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PMBPX
LCSSX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. LCSSX (3.41B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LCSSX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LCSSX (0.00). LCSSX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LCSSX (13 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). LCSSX (0.98) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PMBPX (0) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. PMBPX (11.61). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.82 vs. PMBPX (46.09).
| LCSSX | PMBPX | LCSSX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.83 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.83 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.781 | 2.922 | -27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 30.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 11.61 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 34.38 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.82 | 46.09 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.68 | 95.57 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers