Advertisement
LCTC vs RNSHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCTC is a Hold and RNSHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LCTC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNSHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LCTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RNSHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LCTC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNSHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LCTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RNSHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LCTC (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while RNSHF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+3.32% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| LCTC | RNSHF | LCTC / RNSHF | |
| Capitalization | 8.67M | 3.55B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -849.84K | 157M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 14.545 | 7.393 | 197% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.25 | 29.60 | 173% |
| Revenue | 8.49M | 702M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 996K | 233M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.84M | 17.5M | 11% |
LCTC | RNSHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RNSHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCTC (71). This means that RNSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCTC’s over the last 12 months.
LCTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RNSHF (100). This means that LCTC’s stock grew similarly to RNSHF’s over the last 12 months.
LCTC's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RNSHF (100). This means that LCTC’s stock grew similarly to RNSHF’s over the last 12 months.
RNSHF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LCTC (61). This means that RNSHF’s stock grew similarly to LCTC’s over the last 12 months.
RNSHF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as LCTC (26). This means that RNSHF’s stock grew similarly to LCTC’s over the last 12 months.
| LCTC | RNSHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 29% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
LCTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LCTC and RNSHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCTC and RNSHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCTC | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| RNSHF - LCTC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JELLF - LCTC | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSCIF - LCTC | 6% Poorly correlated | -11.56% | ||
| SIGL - LCTC | 3% Poorly correlated | -13.72% | ||
| QURT - LCTC | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RNSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RNSHF and LCTC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNSHF and LCTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNSHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LCTC - RNSHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| QURT - RNSHF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCND - RNSHF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SEPJF - RNSHF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIGL - RNSHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -13.72% | ||
More | ||||