Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCCX vs LDLKX
LDCCX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDCCX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond C
Price$9.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.95M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.34B
LDCCX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCCX vs. LDLKX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCCX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 43.3B vs. LDCCX (632M). LDLKX pays higher dividends than LDCCX: LDLKX (4.98) vs LDCCX (3.85). LDCCX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDCCX (8 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDCCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LDLKX (0.63). LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCCX (78.00). LDLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDCCX: LDLKX (0) vs LDCCX (1500). LDLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. LDCCX (4.29). LDLKX return over 5 years is better than : 13.06 vs. LDCCX (8.60).
| LDCCX | LDLKX | LDCCX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.63 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.63 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.711 | 4.656 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632M | 43.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 4.98 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | 5.41 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.87 | 17.02 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.60 | 13.06 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers