Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCCX vs LDLKX
LDCCX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDCCX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond C
Price$9.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets591.36M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.21B
LDCCX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCCX vs. LDLKX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCCX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42.2B vs. LDCCX (591M). LDLKX pays higher dividends than LDCCX: LDLKX (4.92) vs LDCCX (4.02). LDCCX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDCCX (8 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDCCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LDLKX (0.63). LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCCX (78.00). LDLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDCCX: LDLKX (0) vs LDCCX (1500). LDLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. LDCCX (5.15). LDLKX return over 5 years is better than : 13.84 vs. LDCCX (8.73).
| LDCCX | LDLKX | LDCCX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.63 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.63 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.398 | 1.656 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 591M | 42.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 4.92 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.15 | 5.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 11.10 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.73 | 13.84 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers