Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCCX vs VFSUX
LDCCX vs VFSUX Comparison
Open Charts LDCCX vs VFSUX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond C
Price$9.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets633.27M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Adm
Price$10.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.48B
LDCCX vs VFSUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCCX vs. VFSUX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCCX is a Hold and VFSUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSUX has more cash in the bank: 53.5B vs. LDCCX (633M). VFSUX pays higher dividends than LDCCX: VFSUX (4.50) vs LDCCX (3.85). LDCCX was incepted earlier than VFSUX: LDCCX (8 years) vs VFSUX (25 years). LDCCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VFSUX (0.09). LDCCX (78.00) and VFSUX (75.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSUX: LDCCX (1500) vs VFSUX (50000). LDCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.29 vs. VFSUX (1.73). LDCCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. VFSUX (-3.63).
| LDCCX | VFSUX | LDCCX / VFSUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.09 | 1,378% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.09 | 1,511% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.711 | 2.519 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 50000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 633M | 53.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 4.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | 1.73 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.87 | 7.74 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | -3.63 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers