Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCFX vs LDLKX
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDCFX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F
Price$9.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.85M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32B
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCFX vs. LDLKX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCFX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. LDCFX (611M). LDLKX (4.96) and LDCFX (4.74) have matching dividends . LDCFX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDCFX (8 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDLKX (0.63) and LDCFX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCFX (78.00). LDCFX (0) and LDLKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDLKX (5.64) and LDCFX (5.44) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLKX return over 5 years is better than : 12.42 vs. LDCFX (11.67).
| LDCFX | LDLKX | LDCFX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.63 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.63 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.166 | 2.367 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 611M | 42.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.74 | 4.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 5.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.08 | 13.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 12.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers