Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCFX vs LDLKX
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDCFX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F
Price$9.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.72M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.48B
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCFX vs. LDLKX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCFX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42.5B vs. LDCFX (618M). LDLKX pays higher dividends than LDCFX: LDLKX (4.97) vs LDCFX (4.71). LDCFX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDCFX (8 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDLKX (0.63) and LDCFX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCFX (78.00). LDCFX (0) and LDLKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDLKX (5.38) and LDCFX (5.18) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLKX (12.36) and LDCFX (11.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDCFX | LDLKX | LDCFX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.63 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.63 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.672 | 2.812 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 618M | 42.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.71 | 4.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 5.38 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.26 | 13.55 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.78 | 12.36 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers