Ad is loading...
LDCFX vs LDLKX
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDCFX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F
Price$9.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.16M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.01B
LDCFX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCFX vs. LDLKX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCFX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. LDCFX (585M). LDLKX (4.91) and LDCFX (4.80) have matching dividends . LDCFX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDCFX (8 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDCFX (0.66) and LDLKX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCFX (78.00). LDCFX (0) and LDLKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDCFX (6.44) and LDLKX (6.43) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLKX return over 5 years is better than : 14.81 vs. LDCFX (13.44).
| LDCFX | LDLKX | LDCFX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.63 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.63 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.591 | 1.489 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 42B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.80 | 4.91 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 6.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 10.64 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 14.81 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...