Ad is loading...
LDCFX vs LOLDX
LDCFX vs LOLDX Comparison
Open Charts LDCFX vs LOLDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F
Price$9.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.16M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.01B
LDCFX vs LOLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCFX vs. LOLDX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCFX is a Hold and LOLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. LDCFX (585M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than LDCFX: LOLDX (5.23) vs LDCFX (4.80). LDCFX was incepted earlier than LOLDX: LDCFX (8 years) vs LOLDX (8 years). LDCFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.31). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCFX (78.00). LDCFX (0) and LOLDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. LDCFX (6.44). LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. LDCFX (13.44).
| LDCFX | LOLDX | LDCFX / LOLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.591 | 1.573 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 42B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.80 | 5.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 6.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 11.72 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 16.67 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...