Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDCFX vs LOLDX
LDCFX vs LOLDX Comparison
Open Charts LDCFX vs LOLDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond F
Price$9.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.85M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32B
LDCFX vs LOLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDCFX vs. LOLDX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDCFX is a Hold and LOLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. LDCFX (611M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than LDCFX: LOLDX (5.28) vs LDCFX (4.74). LDCFX was incepted earlier than LOLDX: LDCFX (8 years) vs LOLDX (8 years). LDCFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LDCFX (78.00). LDCFX (0) and LOLDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. LDCFX (5.44). LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 14.25 vs. LDCFX (11.67).
| LDCFX | LOLDX | LDCFX / LOLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.32 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.32 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.166 | 2.509 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 611M | 42.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.74 | 5.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 6.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.08 | 14.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 14.25 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers