Ad is loading...
LDFOX vs RMFCX
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$14.50
Change+$0.25 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. LDFOX (1.77B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LDFOX (1.05). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LDFOX (-1.84). LDFOX (54.34) and RMFCX (53.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMFCX | LDFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.537 | -2.681 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 97.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.84 | 1.87 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.63 | 6.27 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 53.32 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.78 | - |