Ad is loading...
LDFOX vs RMFCX
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$15.96
Change-$0.27 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LDFOX (1.96B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LDFOX (0.94). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFOX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LDFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. RMFCX (11.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. LDFOX (36.44).
| LDFOX | RMFCX | LDFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.974 | 4.836 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 11.03 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.12 | 19.69 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.44 | 41.75 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...