Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMFCX
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFOX (2.05B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LDFOX (0.99). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (6.98) and LDFOX (6.96) have marching annual gain over last year. LDFOX (54.44) and RMFCX (54.21) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMFCX | LDFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 11.642 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 6.98 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.68 | 29.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 54.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement