Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMFCX
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$15.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LDFOX (1.9B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LDFOX (1.08). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. LDFOX (3.35). LDFOX (61.03) and RMFCX (59.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMFCX | LDFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.586 | 2.924 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.37 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | 5.22 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.07 | 18.48 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.03 | 59.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement