Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMFCX
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
LDFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFOX (2.01B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LDFOX (0.99). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (11.08) and LDFOX (10.97) have marching annual gain over last year. LDFOX (54.99) and RMFCX (54.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMFCX | LDFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.362 | 9.394 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 11.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.60 | 25.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.99 | 54.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers