Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMFEX
LDFOX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.97
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LDFOX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFOX (2.05B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LDFOX (0.99). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LDFOX (8 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LDFOX (0.63) and RMFEX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LDFOX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. LDFOX (6.96). RMFEX (56.62) and LDFOX (54.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMFEX | LDFOX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 11.858 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.51 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.68 | 30.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 56.62 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement