Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LDFVX (2.05B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LDFVX (0.78). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. LDFVX (6.52). RMFCX (54.21) and LDFVX (52.21) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.821 | 11.642 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 6.98 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.49 | 29.24 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.21 | 54.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.71 | 91.22 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement