Ad is loading...
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$14.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LDFVX (1.77B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LDFVX (0.83). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. LDFVX (0.16). LDFVX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. RMFCX (48.78).
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.972 | -3.342 | 179% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 96.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.34 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | 3.60 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 5.79 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.97 | 48.78 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.38 | 52.90 | 22% |