Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LDFVX (1.94B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LDFVX (0.82). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. LDFVX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. LDFVX (60.42).
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.986 | 7.403 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 9.64 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.50 | 26.42 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.42 | 63.87 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.34 | 76.11 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement