Ad is loading...
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.26
Change+$0.34 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.18
Change+$1.19 (+2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LDFVX (1.87B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LDFVX (0.85). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. LDFVX (1.13). LDFVX return over 5 years is better than : 66.09 vs. RMFCX (60.36).
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.995 | 1.050 | -95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.37 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.13 | 4.10 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.75 | 16.28 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.09 | 60.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.59 | 58.87 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...