Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$15.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LDFVX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LDFVX (0.82). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. LDFVX (5.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. LDFVX (43.56).
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 5.423 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 8.44 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.39 | 18.47 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 50.95 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.85 | 69.73 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement