Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLAX vs VFSTX
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LDLAX vs VFSTX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income C
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.24B
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.46B
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLAX vs. VFSTX commentary
Jun 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLAX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.5B vs. LDLAX (42.2B). LDLAX (4.39) and VFSTX (4.28) have matching dividends . LDLAX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LDLAX (29 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LDLAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. VFSTX (75.00). LDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LDLAX (1500) vs VFSTX (3000). LDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.31 vs. VFSTX (2.34). LDLAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.94 vs. VFSTX (-4.50).
| LDLAX | VFSTX | LDLAX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.20 | 595% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.20 | 595% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.861 | 0.952 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2B | 52.5B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 4.28 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.31 | 2.34 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | 3.35 | 315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.94 | -4.50 | -198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.94 | 5.84 | 324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers