Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLAX vs VFSTX
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LDLAX vs VFSTX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income C
Price$3.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.48B
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.72B
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLAX vs. VFSTX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLAX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.7B vs. LDLAX (42.5B). LDLAX (4.39) and VFSTX (4.31) have matching dividends . LDLAX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LDLAX (29 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LDLAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. VFSTX (75.00). LDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LDLAX (1500) vs VFSTX (3000). LDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. VFSTX (1.83). LDLAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.16 vs. VFSTX (-4.39).
| LDLAX | VFSTX | LDLAX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.20 | 595% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.20 | 595% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.517 | 1.536 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5B | 52.7B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 4.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 1.83 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 3.95 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.16 | -4.39 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.65 | 6.28 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement