Ad is loading...
LDLAX vs VFSTX
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts LDLAX vs VFSTX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income C
Price$3.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.01B
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.58B
LDLAX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLAX vs. VFSTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLAX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.6B vs. LDLAX (42B). LDLAX (4.35) and VFSTX (4.18) have matching dividends . LDLAX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: LDLAX (29 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). LDLAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). LDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. VFSTX (70.00). LDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: LDLAX (1500) vs VFSTX (3000). LDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. VFSTX (3.35). LDLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. VFSTX (-2.44).
| LDLAX | VFSTX | LDLAX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.20 | 610% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.20 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.085 | 1.244 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42B | 52.6B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 4.18 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 3.35 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.55 | 2.83 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | -2.44 | -460% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.55 | 5.72 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...