Ad is loading...
LDLFX vs LDLKX
LDLFX vs LDLKX Comparison
Open Charts LDLFX vs LDLKX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.95B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.95B
LDLFX vs LDLKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLFX vs. LDLKX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLFX is a Hold and LDLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLFX (41.9B) and LDLKX (41.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LDLFX (5.07) and LDLKX (4.91) have matching dividends . LDLFX was incepted earlier than LDLKX: LDLFX (18 years) vs LDLKX (10 years). LDLKX (0.63) is less costly to investors than LDLFX (0.48). LDLFX (92.00) and LDLKX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDLFX (0) and LDLKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. LDLKX (6.16). LDLFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.93 vs. LDLKX (14.80).
| LDLFX | LDLKX | LDLFX / LDLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.63 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.63 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.528 | 1.228 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 41.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.07 | 4.91 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 6.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.11 | 10.34 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.93 | 14.80 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...