Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLFX vs LDLVX
LDLFX vs LDLVX Comparison
Open Charts LDLFX vs LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F
Price$3.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.83B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R6
Price$3.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.83B
LDLFX vs LDLVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLFX vs. LDLVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLFX is a Hold and LDLVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLFX (42.8B) and LDLVX (42.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LDLVX (5.32) and LDLFX (5.14) have matching dividends . LDLFX was incepted earlier than LDLVX: LDLFX (18 years) vs LDLVX (10 years). LDLFX (0.48) is less costly to investors than LDLVX (0.32). LDLFX (92.00) and LDLVX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. LDLFX (0) and LDLVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDLVX (6.04) and LDLFX (5.85) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.57 vs. LDLFX (13.57).
| LDLFX | LDLVX | LDLFX / LDLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.32 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.32 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.222 | 5.383 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.8B | 42.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.14 | 5.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 6.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.97 | 18.60 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.57 | 14.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.89 | 34.20 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers