Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLKX vs LSCSX
LDLKX vs LSCSX Comparison
Open Charts LDLKX vs LSCSX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R4
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond R4
Price$9.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.85M
LDLKX vs LSCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLKX vs. LSCSX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLKX is a Hold and LSCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLKX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. LSCSX (611M). LDLKX pays higher dividends than LSCSX: LDLKX (4.96) vs LSCSX (4.60). LDLKX was incepted earlier than LSCSX: LDLKX (10 years) vs LSCSX (8 years). LSCSX (0.77) is less costly to investors than LDLKX (0.63). LDLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LSCSX (78.00). LDLKX (0) and LSCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LDLKX (5.64) and LSCSX (5.40) have marching annual gain over last year. LDLKX return over 5 years is better than : 12.69 vs. LSCSX (11.32).
| LDLKX | LSCSX | LDLKX / LSCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.65 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.367 | 2.102 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 611M | 6,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 4.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 5.40 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.92 | 14.06 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.69 | 11.32 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers