Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDLVX vs MNSGX
LDLVX vs MNSGX Comparison
Open Charts LDLVX vs MNSGX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income R6
Price$3.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.18B
Allspring Short Duration Govt Bd Adm
Price$9.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.08M
LDLVX vs MNSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDLVX vs. MNSGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDLVX is a Hold and MNSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDLVX has more cash in the bank: 43.2B vs. MNSGX (208M). LDLVX pays higher dividends than MNSGX: LDLVX (5.32) vs MNSGX (4.33). LDLVX was incepted earlier than MNSGX: LDLVX (10 years) vs MNSGX (33 years). MNSGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than LDLVX (0.32). MNSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. LDLVX (92.00). LDLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNSGX: LDLVX (0) vs MNSGX (1000000). LDLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. MNSGX (4.22). LDLVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.68 vs. MNSGX (5.95).
| LDLVX | MNSGX | LDLVX / MNSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.60 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.81 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.734 | 4.077 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 208M | 20,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.32 | 4.33 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 4.22 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.82 | 13.25 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.68 | 5.95 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.06 | 15.58 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement