LDNXF
Price
$125.50
Change
-$2.00 (-1.57%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
66.32B
MSCI
Price
$568.55
Change
-$1.60 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
43.99B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LDNXF vs MSCI

Header iconLDNXF vs MSCI Comparison
Open Charts LDNXF vs MSCIBanner chart's image
London Stock Exchange Group
Price$125.50
Change-$2.00 (-1.57%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization66.32B
MSCI
Price$568.55
Change-$1.60 (-0.28%)
Volume$521.74K
Capitalization43.99B
LDNXF vs MSCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LDNXF vs. MSCI commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDNXF is a Hold and MSCI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LDNXF: $125.50 vs. MSCI: $568.55)
Brand notoriety: LDNXF and MSCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LDNXF: 34% vs. MSCI: 69%
Market capitalization -- LDNXF: $66.32B vs. MSCI: $43.99B
LDNXF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $66.32B. MSCI’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $43.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LDNXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LDNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than LDNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LDNXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LDNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSCI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the short-term than LDNXF.

Price Growth

LDNXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -4.40% price change this week, while MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.06% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDNXF($66.3B) has a higher market cap than MSCI($44B). LDNXF has higher P/E ratio than MSCI: LDNXF (50.14) vs MSCI (37.68). MSCI YTD gains are higher at: -4.342 vs. LDNXF (-9.524). LDNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.29B vs. MSCI (1.83B). LDNXF has more cash in the bank: 769B vs. MSCI (344M). MSCI has less debt than LDNXF: MSCI (4.63B) vs LDNXF (9.99B). LDNXF has higher revenues than MSCI: LDNXF (9.14B) vs MSCI (2.99B).
LDNXFMSCILDNXF / MSCI
Capitalization66.3B44B151%
EBITDA4.29B1.83B234%
Gain YTD-9.524-4.342219%
P/E Ratio50.1437.68133%
Revenue9.14B2.99B306%
Total Cash769B344M223,547%
Total Debt9.99B4.63B216%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LDNXF vs MSCI: Fundamental Ratings
LDNXF
MSCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7562
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8354
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (5) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LDNXF (56) in the null industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as LDNXF (83) in the null industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as LDNXF (100) in the null industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as LDNXF (79) in the null industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as LDNXF (100) in the null industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LDNXFMSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMCL24.880.40
+1.63%
Caledonia Mining Corp
CX9.040.11
+1.23%
Cemex SAB de CV
FURY0.51N/A
-0.20%
Fury Gold Mines Limited
BB3.83-0.02
-0.52%
BlackBerry Limited
AQMS3.61-0.18
-4.75%
Aqua Metals Inc

LDNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LDNXF has been loosely correlated with LNSTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LDNXF jumps, then LNSTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDNXF
1D Price
Change %
LDNXF100%
-1.57%
LNSTY - LDNXF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
MSCI - LDNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
ASXFY - LDNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
SPGI - LDNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
DBOEY - LDNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-0.28%
MCO - MSCI
66%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
MORN - MSCI
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
SPGI - MSCI
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
NDAQ - MSCI
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
TRU - MSCI
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More