It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYHGJ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YHGJ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LE (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -7.02% price change this week, while YHGJ (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -24.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.67%.
LE is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
YHGJ is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Containers/Packaging (-0.25% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
LE | YHGJ | LE / YHGJ | |
Capitalization | 353M | 33M | 1,070% |
EBITDA | 69.5M | 51K | 136,275% |
Gain YTD | 38.494 | -78.899 | -49% |
P/E Ratio | 27.78 | 77.00 | 36% |
Revenue | 1.53B | 16.6M | 9,241% |
Total Cash | 26.6M | 64K | 41,563% |
Total Debt | 337M | 8.71M | 3,869% |
LE | YHGJ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LE's Valuation (63) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as YHGJ (83) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to YHGJ’s over the last 12 months.
LE's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as YHGJ (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to YHGJ’s over the last 12 months.
LE's SMR Rating (92) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as YHGJ (96) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to YHGJ’s over the last 12 months.
LE's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YHGJ (96) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LE’s stock grew somewhat faster than YHGJ’s over the last 12 months.
LE's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for YHGJ (94) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LE’s stock grew significantly faster than YHGJ’s over the last 12 months.
LE | YHGJ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago85% | 8 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago86% | 2 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 6 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YHGJ has been loosely correlated with LE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YHGJ jumps, then LE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YHGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YHGJ | 100% | -4.08% | ||
LE - YHGJ | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
GRWG - YHGJ | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
ACVA - YHGJ | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
CARS - YHGJ | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BARK - YHGJ | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
More |