LEAT vs LNNGY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAT is a Hold and LNNGY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNNGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LNNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNNGY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNNGY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LEAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а +4.64% price change this week, while LNNGY (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
LEAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
LNNGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+4.36% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| LEAT | LNNGY | LEAT / LNNGY | |
| Capitalization | 69M | 15.9B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 10.4M | 6.97B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -16.286 | -5.269 | 309% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.45 | 26.32 | 40% |
| Revenue | 65.2M | 25.8B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 11.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.89M | N/A | - |
LEAT | LNNGY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNNGY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEAT (79). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEAT’s over the last 12 months.
LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGY (100). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LEAT (91). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew significantly faster than LEAT’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as LEAT (63). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to LEAT’s over the last 12 months.
LEAT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNNGY (79). This means that LEAT’s stock grew significantly faster than LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.
| LNNGY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
LEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and NINOF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and NINOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAT | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| NINOF - LEAT | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NINOY - LEAT | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
| LNNGY - LEAT | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| NCBDF - LEAT | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OLCLY - LEAT | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
More | ||||
LNNGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNNGY has been closely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNNGY jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNNGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNNGY | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| ANPDY - LNNGY | 74% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| ANPDF - LNNGY | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| HAS - LNNGY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| SMNNY - LNNGY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| MCFT - LNNGY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||