LEAT
Price
$9.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
68.97M
OLCLY
Price
$22.65
Change
+$0.14 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
63.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEAT vs OLCLY

Header iconLEAT vs OLCLY Comparison
Open Charts LEAT vs OLCLYBanner chart's image
Leatt
Price$9.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.93K
Capitalization68.97M
Oriental Land
Price$22.65
Change+$0.14 (+0.62%)
Volume$57.97K
Capitalization63.42B
LEAT vs OLCLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OLCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEAT vs. OLCLY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAT is a Hold and OLCLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LEAT: $9.02 vs. OLCLY: $22.65)
Brand notoriety: LEAT and OLCLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEAT: 235% vs. OLCLY: 106%
Market capitalization -- LEAT: $68.97M vs. OLCLY: $63.42B
LEAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $68.97M. OLCLY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $63.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLCLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLCLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEAT is a better buy in the long-term than OLCLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLCLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OLCLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

LEAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а +8.66% price change this week, while OLCLY (@Recreational Products) price change was +3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEAT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

OLCLY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.07% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLCLY($63.4B) has a higher market cap than LEAT($69M). OLCLY has higher P/E ratio than LEAT: OLCLY (108.70) vs LEAT (10.45). LEAT YTD gains are higher at: 28.843 vs. OLCLY (5.447). OLCLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 98.5B vs. LEAT (10.4M). OLCLY has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. LEAT (11.4M). LEAT has less debt than OLCLY: LEAT (1.89M) vs OLCLY (242B). OLCLY has higher revenues than LEAT: OLCLY (436B) vs LEAT (65.2M).
LEATOLCLYLEAT / OLCLY
Capitalization69M63.4B0%
EBITDA10.4M98.5B0%
Gain YTD28.8435.447530%
P/E Ratio10.45108.7010%
Revenue65.2M436B0%
Total Cash11.4M275B0%
Total Debt1.89M242B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEAT vs OLCLY: Fundamental Ratings
LEAT
OLCLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
9094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
286
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEAT's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (96). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (100). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (94). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (54). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLCLY (86). This means that LEAT’s stock grew significantly faster than OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLCLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OLCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMDD22.770.22
+0.96%
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
MGC224.221.06
+0.47%
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
SYLD65.110.23
+0.35%
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
PHB18.410.02
+0.11%
Invesco Fundamental Hi Yld® Corp Bd ETF
INDS36.830.04
+0.10%
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF

LEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and NINOF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and NINOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEAT
1D Price
Change %
LEAT100%
-0.01%
NINOF - LEAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - LEAT
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
LNNGY - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
NCBDF - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLY - LEAT
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More

OLCLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OLCLY and LCII have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLCLY and LCII's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLCLY
1D Price
Change %
OLCLY100%
+0.62%
LCII - OLCLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
PII - OLCLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
THO - OLCLY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
HOG - OLCLY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
NCBDY - OLCLY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More