LEAT
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
OLCLY
Price
$21.55
Change
+$0.04 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

LEAT vs OLCLY

Header iconLEAT vs OLCLY Comparison
Open Charts LEAT vs OLCLYBanner chart's image
Leatt
Price$7.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$552
CapitalizationN/A
Oriental Land
Price$21.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
Volume$90.24K
CapitalizationN/A
LEAT vs OLCLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEAT vs. OLCLY commentary
Jan 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAT is a Hold and OLCLY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LEAT: $7.00 vs. OLCLY: $21.55)
Brand notoriety: LEAT and OLCLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEAT: 12% vs. OLCLY: 85%
Market capitalization -- LEAT: $68.97M vs. OLCLY: $63.42B
LEAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $68.97M. OLCLY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $63.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLCLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLCLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEAT is a better buy in the long-term than OLCLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLCLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OLCLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLCLY is a better buy in the short-term than LEAT.

Price Growth

LEAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -2.10% price change this week, while OLCLY (@Recreational Products) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEAT is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.17% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLCLY($63.4B) has a higher market cap than LEAT($69M). OLCLY has higher P/E ratio than LEAT: OLCLY (108.70) vs LEAT (10.45). OLCLY YTD gains are higher at: 0.326 vs. LEAT (0.000). OLCLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 98.5B vs. LEAT (10.4M). OLCLY has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. LEAT (11.4M). LEAT has less debt than OLCLY: LEAT (1.89M) vs OLCLY (242B). OLCLY has higher revenues than LEAT: OLCLY (436B) vs LEAT (65.2M).
LEATOLCLYLEAT / OLCLY
Capitalization69M63.4B0%
EBITDA10.4M98.5B0%
Gain YTD0.0000.326-
P/E Ratio10.45108.7010%
Revenue65.2M436B0%
Total Cash11.4M275B0%
Total Debt1.89M242B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEAT vs OLCLY: Fundamental Ratings
LEAT
OLCLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
282
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEAT's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (89). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (100). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (95). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLY (84). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLCLY (82). This means that LEAT’s stock grew significantly faster than OLCLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEATOLCLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLCLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMIFX10.320.21
+2.08%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R4
GTDYX32.640.10
+0.31%
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Y
OIGIX31.400.06
+0.19%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R6
ASMZX15.33N/A
N/A
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Z
PAHSX7.65N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps A

LEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and NINOF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and NINOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEAT
1D Price
Change %
LEAT100%
N/A
NINOF - LEAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - LEAT
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
LNNGY - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
NCBDF - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLY - LEAT
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

OLCLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OLCLY and LCII have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLCLY and LCII's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLCLY
1D Price
Change %
OLCLY100%
+0.19%
LCII - OLCLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
PII - OLCLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
THO - OLCLY
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
HOG - OLCLY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
NCBDY - OLCLY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More