It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNYT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NYT’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEE (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +5.41% price change this week, while NYT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +2.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.45%.
LEE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
NYT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
LEE | NYT | LEE / NYT | |
Capitalization | 79.9M | 7.05B | 1% |
EBITDA | 67.4M | 399M | 17% |
Gain YTD | -39.378 | -2.168 | 1,817% |
P/E Ratio | 10.64 | 30.62 | 35% |
Revenue | 662M | 2.43B | 27% |
Total Cash | 15.4M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 496M | 42.9M | 1,156% |
LEE | NYT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NYT's Valuation (69) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as LEE (77). This means that NYT’s stock grew similarly to LEE’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEE (100). This means that NYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEE’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's SMR Rating (54) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEE (99). This means that NYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEE’s over the last 12 months.
NYT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEE (90). This means that NYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEE’s over the last 12 months.
LEE's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as NYT (54). This means that LEE’s stock grew similarly to NYT’s over the last 12 months.
LEE | NYT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago52% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago77% | 2 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago80% | 18 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago56% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GLO | 4.87 | 0.11 | +2.31% |
Clough Global Opportunities Fund | |||
QTAP | 37.55 | 0.82 | +2.24% |
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April | |||
VOTE | 64.20 | 1.26 | +2.01% |
TCW Transform 500 ETF | |||
EFAV | 81.25 | 0.47 | +0.58% |
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | |||
SMAY | 23.26 | 0.07 | +0.28% |
FT Vest US Sm Cp Mod Buffr ETF- May |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NYT has been loosely correlated with WLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NYT jumps, then WLY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NYT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NYT | 100% | +0.34% | ||
WLY - NYT | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
RELX - NYT | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
GCI - NYT | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
PSO - NYT | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
SCHL - NYT | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More |