It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePATK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEG (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -9.39% price change this week, while PATK (@Home Furnishings) price change was -7.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -7.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.34%.
LEG is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.
PATK is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
LEG | PATK | LEG / PATK | |
Capitalization | 2.56B | 2.67B | 96% |
EBITDA | 94.9M | 405M | 23% |
Gain YTD | -22.117 | -3.170 | 698% |
P/E Ratio | 14.58 | 18.24 | 80% |
Revenue | 4.73B | 3.47B | 136% |
Total Cash | 366M | 11.4M | 3,211% |
Total Debt | 2.2B | 1.21B | 182% |
LEG | PATK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LEG's Valuation (28) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as PATK (38) in the Building Products industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.
PATK's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEG (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEG’s over the last 12 months.
PATK's SMR Rating (60) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEG (97) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEG’s over the last 12 months.
PATK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEG (84) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEG’s over the last 12 months.
PATK's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LEG (36) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to LEG’s over the last 12 months.
LEG | PATK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago55% | 3 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 8 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEG has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEG jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LEG | 100% | -10.48% | ||
MHK - LEG | 44% Loosely correlated | -7.95% | ||
TILE - LEG | 42% Loosely correlated | -7.32% | ||
MBC - LEG | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.75% | ||
PATK - LEG | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.12% | ||
ETD - LEG | 39% Loosely correlated | -7.99% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PATK | 100% | -9.12% | ||
ETD - PATK | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.99% | ||
AMWD - PATK | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
MBC - PATK | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.75% | ||
WHR - PATK | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.13% | ||
MHK - PATK | 52% Loosely correlated | -7.95% | ||
More |