Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQAX vs NLSCX
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$12.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.38M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.59B
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.59B vs. LEQAX (39.4M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LEQAX (0.50) vs NLSCX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQAX (12 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQAX (2.60) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). LEQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. NLSCX (8.07). LEQAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. NLSCX (19.43).
| LEQAX | NLSCX | LEQAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.43 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.60 | 2.43 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.981 | 5.257 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.4M | 7.59B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 8.07 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 11.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 19.43 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.81 | 38.46 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement