Ad is loading...
LEQCX vs NLSAX
LEQCX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSAX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$10.31
Change-$0.10 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.08M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.33
Change+$0.53 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.98B
LEQCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.98B vs. LEQCX (43.1M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). LEQCX (3.28) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 932.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSAX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. LEQCX (-2.35). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.23 vs. LEQCX (23.93).
| LEQCX | NLSAX | LEQCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.22 | 1.68 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.28 | 1.68 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.336 | -3.359 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 6.98B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | 1.42 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.36 | 5.14 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.93 | 27.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.20 | 33.76 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...