Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSAX
LEQCX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSAX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.16M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.47
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
LEQCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. LEQCX (39.2M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSAX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. LEQCX (10.58). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.69 vs. LEQCX (22.75).
| LEQCX | NLSAX | LEQCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.68 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 1.68 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.861 | 5.688 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2M | 7.58B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 11.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.10 | 16.00 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.75 | 26.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.93 | 48.99 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement