Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSCX
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.21M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.17
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. LEQCX (42.2M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). LEQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. NLSCX (5.44). LEQCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. NLSCX (21.19).
| LEQCX | NLSCX | LEQCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 2.43 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.584 | 1.809 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 7.33B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 5.44 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.56 | 12.63 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.42 | 21.19 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.61 | 31.83 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers