Ad is loading...
LEQCX vs NLSCX
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$10.31
Change-$0.10 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.08M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.02
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. LEQCX (43.1M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). LEQCX (3.28) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 932.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. LEQCX (-2.35). LEQCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.93 vs. NLSCX (22.27).
| LEQCX | NLSCX | LEQCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.22 | 2.43 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.28 | 2.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.336 | -3.561 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | 0.65 | -361% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.36 | 2.65 | -202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.93 | 22.27 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.20 | 23.81 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers