Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSCX
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$12.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.74M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.49B
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. LEQCX (39.7M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). LEQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. NLSCX (7.74). LEQCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.05 vs. NLSCX (17.21).
| LEQCX | NLSCX | LEQCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 2.43 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.445 | 5.483 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.7M | 7.49B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 7.74 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.98 | 14.98 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.05 | 17.21 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.63 | 42.15 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers