Ad is loading...
LEQCX vs NLSIX
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSIX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$10.31
Change-$0.10 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.08M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.09
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. LEQCX (43.1M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs LEQCX (0.00). LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). LEQCX (3.28) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 932.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). LEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: LEQCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.82 vs. LEQCX (-2.35). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.77 vs. LEQCX (23.93).
| LEQCX | NLSIX | LEQCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.22 | 1.32 | 244% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.28 | 1.32 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.336 | -3.253 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | 1.82 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.36 | 6.42 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.93 | 29.77 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.20 | 38.95 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...