Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSIX
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSIX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.19M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.92
Change-$0.10 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.97B
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.97B vs. LEQCX (31.2M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs LEQCX (0.00). LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: LEQCX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). LEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: LEQCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. LEQCX (1.39). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.68 vs. LEQCX (14.69).
| LEQCX | NLSIX | LEQCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.32 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 1.32 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.861 | 6.773 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.2M | 7.97B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 7.72 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.03 | 21.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.69 | 22.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.00 | 61.37 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement