Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFEBX vs RHFTX
LFEBX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFEBX vs. RHFTX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFEBX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 54.1B vs. LFEBX (643M). LFEBX (1.66) and RHFTX (1.61) have matching dividends . LFEBX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: LFEBX (13 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). LFEBX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). LFEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFEBX: RHFTX (250) vs LFEBX (1000). RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. LFEBX (5.80). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 28.78 vs. LFEBX (25.47).
| LFEBX | RHFTX | LFEBX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.48 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.48 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.755 | 15.890 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 643M | 54.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.61 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 10.70 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.66 | 35.18 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.47 | 28.78 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.86 | 77.52 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers