Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFEQ vs RECS
LFEQ vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LFEQ vs RECS
VanEck Lg/Flat Trend ETF
Price$53.19
Change+$0.37 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.6M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.54K
Net Assets4.32B
LFEQ vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFEQ vs. RECS commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFEQ is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.32B vs. LFEQ (26.6M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LFEQ: RECS (14.934) vs LFEQ (6.115). LFEQ was incepted earlier than RECS: LFEQ (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LFEQ (0.64). RECS has a higher turnover LFEQ (1.00) vs LFEQ (1.00).
| LFEQ | RECS | LFEQ / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.115 | 14.934 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 26.6M | 4.32B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.15 | 427% |
| Turnover | 1.00 | 49.00 | 2% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.59 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LFEQ | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||