Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs RGAHX
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs RGAHX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$40.90
Change+$0.25 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.77M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.08
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LFGCX (167M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: RGAHX (0.45) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LFGCX (7 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: RGAHX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.10 vs. RGAHX (15.01). RGAHX (45.37) and LFGCX (43.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LFGCX | RGAHX | LFGCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.44 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.44 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.553 | 19.935 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.10 | 15.01 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.43 | 76.39 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.49 | 45.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement