Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGIX vs RGACX
LFGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGIX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth I
Price$42.35
Change+$0.60 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
LFGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGIX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LFGIX (157M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGIX (0.00). LFGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGIX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGIX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGIX: RGACX (250) vs LFGIX (1000000). LFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.10 vs. RGACX (17.83). LFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 59.57 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| LFGIX | RGACX | LFGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.94 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.739 | 15.516 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.10 | 17.83 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.88 | 58.53 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.57 | 40.02 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement