LFGP
Price
$13.77
Change
-$0.07 (-0.51%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
47.71M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PFBC
Price
$86.60
Change
+$1.29 (+1.51%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
99 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFGP vs PFBC

Header iconLFGP vs PFBC Comparison
Open Charts LFGP vs PFBCBanner chart's image
Ledyard Financial Group
Price$13.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.51%)
Volume$260
Capitalization47.71M
Preferred Bank
Price$86.60
Change+$1.29 (+1.51%)
Volume$69.32K
Capitalization1.07B
LFGP vs PFBC Comparison Chart in %
LFGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFGP vs. PFBC commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGP is a Hold and PFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LFGP: $13.77 vs. PFBC: $86.60)
Brand notoriety: LFGP and PFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFGP: 11% vs. PFBC: 92%
Market capitalization -- LFGP: $47.71M vs. PFBC: $1.07B
LFGP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.71M. PFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LFGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFBC is a better buy in the long-term than LFGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFBC is a better buy in the short-term than LFGP.

Price Growth

LFGP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while PFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+5.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFBC($1.07B) has a higher market cap than LFGP($47.7M). LFGP has higher P/E ratio than PFBC: LFGP (11.47) vs PFBC (9.11). PFBC YTD gains are higher at: 3.846 vs. LFGP (-6.337). LFGP has less debt than PFBC: LFGP (111M) vs PFBC (372M). PFBC has higher revenues than LFGP: PFBC (280M) vs LFGP (33.2M).
LFGPPFBCLFGP / PFBC
Capitalization47.7M1.07B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.3373.846-165%
P/E Ratio11.479.11126%
Revenue33.2M280M12%
Total Cash4.44MN/A-
Total Debt111M372M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFGP vs PFBC: Fundamental Ratings
LFGP
PFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8923
SMR RATING
1..100
7720
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9335
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFGP's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LFGP’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFGP (89) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than LFGP’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFGP (77) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFGP’s over the last 12 months.

LFGP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LFGP’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFGP (93) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFGPPFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLTLF0.290.04
+13.97%
LibertyStream Infrastructure Partners Inc.
REPYF16.60N/A
N/A
Repsol S.A.
FRTAY16.68N/A
N/A
Freenet AG
MRETF7.07-0.11
-1.52%
Martinrea International Inc.
CBMJ0.05N/A
-2.61%
Conservative Broadcast Media & Journalism Inc.

LFGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFGP and VLY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFGP and VLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFGP
1D Price
Change %
LFGP100%
-0.51%
VLY - LFGP
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
PFBC - LFGP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
FLG - LFGP
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
CVBF - LFGP
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
INDB - LFGP
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More