Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGSX vs RGACX
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4
Price$43.66
Change+$0.64 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.11M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LFGSX (168M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGSX (0.00). LFGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGSX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGSX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.61 vs. RGACX (14.19). LFGSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.33 vs. RGACX (40.04).
| LFGSX | RGACX | LFGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.94 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.480 | 19.586 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.61 | 14.19 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.83 | 74.27 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.33 | 40.04 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement