Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGVX vs RGAFX
LFGVX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts LFGVX vs RGAFX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R6
Price$41.33
Change+$0.25 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$84.52
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
LFGVX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGVX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGVX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LFGVX (145M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than LFGVX: RGAFX (0.57) vs LFGVX (0.00). LFGVX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: LFGVX (6 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). LFGVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). LFGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). LFGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: LFGVX (0) vs RGAFX (250). LFGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.79 vs. RGAFX (16.89). LFGVX return over 5 years is better than : 65.91 vs. RGAFX (48.03).
| LFGVX | RGAFX | LFGVX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.34 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.34 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.668 | 13.478 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.79 | 16.89 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.01 | 50.01 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.91 | 48.03 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement