Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFMAX vs QMHRX
LFMAX vs QMHRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFMAX vs. QMHRX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMAX is a Hold and QMHRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. QMHRX (730M). LFMAX pays higher dividends than QMHRX: LFMAX (2.93) vs QMHRX (2.22). LFMAX was incepted earlier than QMHRX: LFMAX (14 years) vs QMHRX (11 years). QMHRX (3.93) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). QMHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 657.00 vs. LFMAX (90.00). LFMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QMHRX: LFMAX (2500) vs QMHRX (50000000). QMHRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.22 vs. LFMAX (0.80). QMHRX return over 5 years is better than : 80.45 vs. LFMAX (3.18).
| LFMAX | QMHRX | LFMAX / QMHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 3.77 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 3.93 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 8.086 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 50000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 730M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.22 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 17.22 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.55 | 19.22 | -60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.18 | 80.45 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.36 | 23.40 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement