Advertisement
LFMD vs PETS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMD is a Buy and PETS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFMD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePETS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LFMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PETS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFMD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PETS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFMD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PETS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LFMD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.74% price change this week, while PETS (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +10.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
PETS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+10.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Drugstore Chains (-0.90% weekly)The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.
| LFMD | PETS | LFMD / PETS | |
| Capitalization | 399M | 99.2M | 402% |
| EBITDA | -7.89M | -5.12M | 154% |
| Gain YTD | 159.394 | -32.158 | -496% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 1465.00 | - |
| Revenue | 153M | 271M | 56% |
| Total Cash | 33.1M | 53.5M | 62% |
| Total Debt | 18.9M | 1.84M | 1,029% |
LFMD | PETS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PETS's Valuation (18) in the Drugstore Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFMD (92) in the null industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew significantly faster than LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PETS (100) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to PETS’s over the last 12 months.
PETS's SMR Rating (89) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as LFMD (100) in the null industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PETS (86) in the Drugstore Chains industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than PETS’s over the last 12 months.
PETS's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Drugstore Chains industry is in the same range as LFMD (100) in the null industry. This means that PETS’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
| LFMD | PETS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
LFMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFMD has been loosely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFMD jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFMD | 100% | -8.61% | ||
| XYZ - LFMD | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| PGY - LFMD | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| NRC - LFMD | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| AFRM - LFMD | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| SDGR - LFMD | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
PETS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PETS and LFMD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PETS and LFMD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PETS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETS | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| LFMD - PETS | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.61% | ||
| HITI - PETS | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| YI - PETS | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WBA - PETS | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| SCNX - PETS | 9% Poorly correlated | +7.95% | ||
More | ||||