LFMDP
Price
$23.58
Change
-$0.26 (-1.09%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PETS
Price
$1.68
Change
-$0.18 (-9.68%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.09M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFMDP vs PETS

Header iconLFMDP vs PETS Comparison
Open Charts LFMDP vs PETSBanner chart's image
LifeMD
Price$23.58
Change-$0.26 (-1.09%)
Volume$2.39K
CapitalizationN/A
PetMed Express
Price$1.68
Change-$0.18 (-9.68%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization39.09M
LFMDP vs PETS Comparison Chart in %
LFMDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFMDP vs. PETS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMDP is a Hold and PETS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LFMDP: $23.58 vs. PETS: $1.86)
Brand notoriety: LFMDP and PETS are both not notable
LFMDP represents the Services to the Health Industry, while PETS is part of the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFMDP: 133% vs. PETS: 98%
Market capitalization -- LFMDP: $0 vs. PETS: $35.1M
LFMDP [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $0. PETS’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $35.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.75B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $27.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFMDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePETS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LFMDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PETS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFMDP is a better buy in the long-term than PETS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFMDP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PETS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFMDP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PETS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PETS is a better buy in the short-term than LFMDP.

Price Growth

LFMDP (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while PETS (@Drugstore Chains) price change was -30.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was -7.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

PETS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-6.26% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Drugstore Chains (-7.16% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMDP YTD gains are higher at: 13.832 vs. PETS (-61.411). LFMDP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.55M vs. PETS (7.52M). PETS has more cash in the bank: 50.1M vs. LFMDP (36.2M). PETS has less debt than LFMDP: PETS (1.11M) vs LFMDP (22.1M). PETS (247M) and LFMDP (246M) have equivalent revenues.
LFMDPPETSLFMDP / PETS
CapitalizationN/A39.1M-
EBITDA8.55M7.52M114%
Gain YTD13.832-61.411-23%
P/E RatioN/A256.00-
Revenue246M247M100%
Total Cash36.2M50.1M72%
Total Debt22.1M1.11M2,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PETS: Fundamental Ratings
PETS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFMDPPETS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
47%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFMDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BZ20.800.28
+1.36%
Kanzhun Limited
XOMAO25.400.02
+0.08%
XOMA Corp
DIN26.39-0.03
-0.11%
Dine Brands Global
SION39.12-0.81
-2.03%
Sionna Therapeutics Inc
ELTK9.12-2.28
-20.00%
Eltek Ltd

LFMDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFMDP and CPAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFMDP and CPAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFMDP
1D Price
Change %
LFMDP100%
-1.07%
CPAY - LFMDP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
VEEV - LFMDP
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
FTNT - LFMDP
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
ARQQ - LFMDP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
PTC - LFMDP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

PETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PETS and LFMD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PETS and LFMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PETS
1D Price
Change %
PETS100%
-5.10%
LFMD - PETS
22%
Poorly correlated
-13.74%
YI - PETS
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
HITI - PETS
17%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
HEWA - PETS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFMDP - PETS
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More