Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$27.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.55M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. LFSFX (82.5M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LFSFX (0.00). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. LFSFX (-15.56). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.75 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.499 | -4.415 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 4.98B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.56 | -14.44 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | -10.47 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.75 | 2.06 | 666% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement