Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs WCMFX
LFSFX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs WCMFX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$29.13
Change-$0.29 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.25M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.37
Change-$0.19 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.32M
LFSFX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. WCMFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFSFX has more cash in the bank: 89.2M vs. WCMFX (59.3M). LFSFX (0.00) and WCMFX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFSFX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: LFSFX (6 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than LFSFX (1.20). LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: LFSFX (0) vs WCMFX (100000). LFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.45 vs. WCMFX (-17.25). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.60 vs. WCMFX (39.11).
| LFSFX | WCMFX | LFSFX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.90 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.507 | -3.506 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.2M | 59.3M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.45 | -17.25 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.59 | 23.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.60 | 39.11 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement