LFTSF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Updated
Feb 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
TPGVF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.02 (-13.33%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFTSF vs TPGVF

Header iconLFTSF vs TPGVF Comparison
Open Charts LFTSF vs TPGVFBanner chart's image
LIFETECH SCIENTIFIC
Price$0.23
Change+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.02B
Top Glove
Price$0.13
Change-$0.02 (-13.33%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.14B
LFTSF vs TPGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFTSF vs. TPGVF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFTSF is a Hold and TPGVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LFTSF: $0.23 vs. TPGVF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: LFTSF and TPGVF are both not notable
LFTSF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while TPGVF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFTSF: 100% vs. TPGVF: 5%
Market capitalization -- LFTSF: $1.02B vs. TPGVF: $1.14B
LFTSF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $1.02B. TPGVF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $157.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.49B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFTSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPGVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LFTSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPGVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFTSF is a better buy in the long-term than TPGVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TPGVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TPGVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LFTSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TPGVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.15% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.51% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPGVF($1.14B) has a higher market cap than LFTSF($1.02B). TPGVF has higher P/E ratio than LFTSF: TPGVF (70.58) vs LFTSF (28.06). LFTSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. TPGVF (-56.589). TPGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. LFTSF (253M). TPGVF has higher revenues than LFTSF: TPGVF (3.43B) vs LFTSF (1.27B).
LFTSFTPGVFLFTSF / TPGVF
Capitalization1.02B1.14B90%
EBITDA253M426M59%
Gain YTD0.000-56.589-
P/E Ratio28.0670.5840%
Revenue1.27B3.43B37%
Total CashN/A528M-
Total DebtN/A1.01B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TPGVF: Fundamental Ratings
TPGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFTSFTPGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
1%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIIEX27.16N/A
N/A
Brandes International Equity I
LCBOX31.87N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy 1
IIVLX21.30N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value C
EISGX17.15N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
CUSCX12.52N/A
N/A
Cullen Small Cap Value C

LFTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFTSF has been loosely correlated with CLLKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFTSF jumps, then CLLKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFTSF
1D Price
Change %
LFTSF100%
N/A
CLLKF - LFTSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TPGVF - LFTSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYNZ - LFTSF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
BCCOY - LFTSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBOT - LFTSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
More

TPGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TPGVF and VVOS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPGVF and VVOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPGVF
1D Price
Change %
TPGVF100%
N/A
VVOS - TPGVF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
BCCOY - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFTSF - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLKF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More