LFUS
Price
$193.01
Change
-$3.73 (-1.90%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.86B
35 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$76.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.18%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.14B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LFUS vs SANM

Header iconLFUS vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts LFUS vs SANMBanner chart's image
Littelfuse
Price$193.01
Change-$3.73 (-1.90%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization4.86B
Sanmina
Price$76.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.18%)
Volume$4.76K
Capitalization4.14B
LFUS vs SANM Comparison Chart
Loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFUS vs. SANM commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a Buy and SANM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (LFUS: $196.74 vs. SANM: $76.18)
Brand notoriety: LFUS and SANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFUS: 143% vs. SANM: 96%
Market capitalization -- LFUS: $4.77B vs. SANM: $4.13B
LFUS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $4.77B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $82.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the long-term than LFUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LFUS and SANM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -9.27% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFUS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-4.90% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFUS($4.86B) has a higher market cap than SANM($4.14B). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than SANM: LFUS (50.24) vs SANM (18.63). SANM YTD gains are higher at: 0.674 vs. LFUS (-16.282). SANM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 471M vs. LFUS (321M). LFUS has more cash in the bank: 726M vs. SANM (642M). SANM has less debt than LFUS: SANM (313M) vs LFUS (931M). SANM has higher revenues than LFUS: SANM (7.7B) vs LFUS (2.19B).
LFUSSANMLFUS / SANM
Capitalization4.86B4.14B117%
EBITDA321M471M68%
Gain YTD-16.2820.674-2,416%
P/E Ratio50.2418.63270%
Revenue2.19B7.7B28%
Total Cash726M642M113%
Total Debt931M313M297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFUS vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
LFUS
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6412
SMR RATING
1..100
8566
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (24) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (60) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (64) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SANM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's SMR Rating (66) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (82) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SANM (14) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFUSSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMAY33.480.17
+0.51%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-May
BTT21.230.06
+0.28%
BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust
HAP49.810.08
+0.16%
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
VKI8.540.01
+0.12%
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II
ZSC23.16N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
-2.10%
KN - LFUS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CTS - LFUS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
SANM - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
OLED - LFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
TEL - LFUS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been closely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
-0.61%
CTS - SANM
68%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
BHE - SANM
68%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
FLEX - SANM
66%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
PLXS - SANM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
JBL - SANM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More