Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCCX vs RWBEX
LGCCX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCCX vs RWBEX
Lord Abbett Global Equity C
Price$18.08
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.84M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$68.72
Change+$0.24 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.86B
LGCCX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCCX vs. RWBEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCCX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. LGCCX (175M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCCX: RWBEX (1.11) vs LGCCX (0.00). LGCCX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCCX (8 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). LGCCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). LGCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). RWBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCCX: RWBEX (250) vs LGCCX (1500). LGCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.76 vs. RWBEX (5.87). LGCCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.01 vs. RWBEX (43.71).
| LGCCX | RWBEX | LGCCX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.21 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 1.21 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.744 | 8.820 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.76 | 5.87 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.35 | 27.71 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.01 | 43.71 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement