LGCP
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.05 (-55.56%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PVLUF
Price
$105.28
Change
+$11.49 (+12.25%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCP vs PVLUF

Header iconLGCP vs PVLUF Comparison
Open Charts LGCP vs PVLUFBanner chart's image
Legion Capital
Price$0.04
Change-$0.05 (-55.56%)
Volume$3.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Partners Value Invts
Price$105.28
Change+$11.49 (+12.25%)
Volume$756
CapitalizationN/A
LGCP vs PVLUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCP vs. PVLUF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCP is a Hold and PVLUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LGCP: $0.04 vs. PVLUF: $105.28)
Brand notoriety: LGCP and PVLUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCP: 55% vs. PVLUF: 305%
Market capitalization -- LGCP: $0 vs. PVLUF: $0
LGCP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. PVLUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePVLUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PVLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVLUF is a better buy in the long-term than LGCP.

Price Growth

LGCP (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PVLUF (@Investment Managers) price change was +12.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.01% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVLUF YTD gains are higher at: 109.932 vs. LGCP (57.708).
LGCPPVLUFLGCP / PVLUF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD57.708109.93252%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PVLUF: Fundamental Ratings
PVLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEJX9.230.11
+1.21%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv
SNTKX24.51N/A
N/A
Steward International Enhanced Index A
OSCAX21.19-0.04
-0.19%
Invesco Main Street Small Cap A
NMCAX18.13-0.04
-0.22%
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
NBGEX60.04-0.23
-0.38%
Neuberger Berman Genesis Tr

LGCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCP and ELRNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCP and ELRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCP
1D Price
Change %
LGCP100%
N/A
ELRNF - LGCP
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - LGCP
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - LGCP
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSPF - LGCP
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVLUF - LGCP
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PVLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVLUF and ITPC have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVLUF and ITPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVLUF
1D Price
Change %
PVLUF100%
N/A
ITPC - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGCP - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFAHF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRNF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - PVLUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More