LGDDF vs WOSSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGDDF is a Sell and WOSSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LGDDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWOSSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LGDDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WOSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LGDDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOSSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LGDDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WOSSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LGDDF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WOSSF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.59%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-0.35% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| LGDDF | WOSSF | LGDDF / WOSSF | |
| Capitalization | 3.24B | 134M | 2,415% |
| EBITDA | 1.11B | 301M | 367% |
| Gain YTD | 9.589 | -25.679 | -37% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.70 | 10.88 | 126% |
| Revenue | 7.65B | 946M | 809% |
| Total Cash | 400M | 244M | 164% |
| Total Debt | 4.44B | 284M | 1,564% |
LGDDF | WOSSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WOSSF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LGDDF (22). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to LGDDF’s over the last 12 months.
WOSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LGDDF (100). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to LGDDF’s over the last 12 months.
WOSSF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGDDF (96). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGDDF’s over the last 12 months.
LGDDF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as WOSSF (78). This means that LGDDF’s stock grew similarly to WOSSF’s over the last 12 months.
LGDDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOSSF (79). This means that LGDDF’s stock grew significantly faster than WOSSF’s over the last 12 months.
| LGDDF | WOSSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 24% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | N/A |
LGDDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGDDF and WEBJF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGDDF and WEBJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGDDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGDDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WEBJF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WOSSF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSMNF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNLIY - LGDDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUIFF - LGDDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WOSSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WOSSF and TRZBF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOSSF and TRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOSSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOSSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TRZBF - WOSSF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUIFF - WOSSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNLIY - WOSSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LGDDF - WOSSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OOBHF - WOSSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||