LGGNF
Price
$3.07
Change
-$0.11 (-3.46%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
17.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLX
Price
$20.78
Change
-$0.10 (-0.48%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNF vs TSLX

Header iconLGGNF vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts LGGNF vs TSLXBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$3.07
Change-$0.11 (-3.46%)
Volume$25.19K
Capitalization17.38B
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$20.78
Change-$0.10 (-0.48%)
Volume$443.83K
Capitalization1.96B
LGGNF vs TSLX Comparison Chart in %
LGGNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNF vs. TSLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNF is a Hold and TSLX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNF: $3.08 vs. TSLX: $20.78)
Brand notoriety: LGGNF and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNF: 151% vs. TSLX: 77%
Market capitalization -- LGGNF: $17.38B vs. TSLX: $1.96B
LGGNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.38B. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNF.

Price Growth

LGGNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.17% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNF($17.4B) has a higher market cap than TSLX($1.96B). LGGNF has higher P/E ratio than TSLX: LGGNF (53.13) vs TSLX (10.14). LGGNF YTD gains are higher at: 8.905 vs. TSLX (4.381). TSLX has less debt than LGGNF: TSLX (1.73B) vs LGGNF (4.82B). LGGNF has higher revenues than TSLX: LGGNF (18.6B) vs TSLX (243M).
LGGNFTSLXLGGNF / TSLX
Capitalization17.4B1.96B886%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.9054.381203%
P/E Ratio53.1310.14524%
Revenue18.6B243M7,654%
Total Cash12.4BN/A-
Total Debt4.82B1.73B279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNF vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNF
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8117
SMR RATING
1..100
9519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (17). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNF (81). This means that TSLX’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNF (95). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (60). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (37). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNFTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWPIX21.31N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic I
BCAIX36.89N/A
N/A
Boston Common ESG Impact Intl
BIALX29.67N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Investor
LEOOX9.33N/A
N/A
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Open
FLCPX26.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Large Cap Index

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
+0.39%
LGGNY - LGGNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
SCM - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CSWC - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
TSLX - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
IGIFF - LGGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More