LGGNF
Price
$2.83
Change
-$0.12 (-4.07%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
TSLX
Price
$21.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LGGNF vs TSLX

Header iconLGGNF vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts LGGNF vs TSLXBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$2.83
Change-$0.12 (-4.07%)
Volume$42.38K
CapitalizationN/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$21.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$390.96K
CapitalizationN/A
LGGNF vs TSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNF vs. TSLX commentary
Jan 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNF is a Hold and TSLX is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNF: $2.83 vs. TSLX: $21.30)
Brand notoriety: LGGNF and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNF: 170% vs. TSLX: 115%
Market capitalization -- LGGNF: $17.93B vs. TSLX: $1.94B
LGGNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.93B. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNF.

Price Growth

LGGNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.44% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than TSLX($1.94B). TSLX has higher P/E ratio than LGGNF: TSLX (8.11) vs LGGNF (6.20). TSLX YTD gains are higher at: 8.828 vs. LGGNF (-9.585). TSLX has less debt than LGGNF: TSLX (1.78B) vs LGGNF (5.56B). TSLX has higher revenues than LGGNF: TSLX (273M) vs LGGNF (-89.29B).
LGGNFTSLXLGGNF / TSLX
Capitalization17.9B1.94B921%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.5858.828-109%
P/E Ratio6.208.1177%
Revenue-89.29B273M-32,708%
Total Cash36.6BN/A-
Total Debt5.56B1.78B312%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNF vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNF
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
709
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
9814
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (14). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNF (100). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNF (98). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (54). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (29). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNFTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASRAX7.900.03
+0.38%
Invesco Global Real Estate Income A
MDFGX37.39N/A
N/A
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Inv A
GEGCX13.36-0.04
-0.30%
abrdn Emerging Markets C
CFNCX80.75-0.36
-0.44%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C
LDVAX24.66-0.22
-0.88%
AXS FTSE Vntr Cptl RetTrckr A

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
-4.00%
LGGNY - LGGNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
SCM - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
CSWC - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
TSLX - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIFF - LGGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More

TSLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLX has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSLX jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLX
1D Price
Change %
TSLX100%
N/A
ARCC - TSLX
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
NMFC - TSLX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
MAIN - TSLX
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
GBDC - TSLX
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
GLAD - TSLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More