LGGNY
Price
$15.81
Change
-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.93B
MGHCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.35M
Ad is loading...

LGGNY vs MGHCF

Header iconLGGNY vs MGHCF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNY vs MGHCFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$15.81
Change-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Volume$30.9K
Capitalization17.93B
MINCO CAP
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization2.35M
LGGNY vs MGHCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNY vs. MGHCF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNY is a Hold and MGHCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNY: $15.81 vs. MGHCF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: LGGNY and MGHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNY: 69% vs. MGHCF: 520%
Market capitalization -- LGGNY: $17.93B vs. MGHCF: $2.35M
LGGNY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.93B. MGHCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGHCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNY is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

LGGNY (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while MGHCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +21.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGGNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNY($17.9B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.35M). LGGNY YTD gains are higher at: 9.110 vs. MGHCF (-9.001). MGHCF has higher revenues than LGGNY: MGHCF (282K) vs LGGNY (-89.29B).
LGGNYMGHCFLGGNY / MGHCF
Capitalization17.9B2.35M762,026%
EBITDAN/A-2.71M-
Gain YTD9.110-9.001-101%
P/E Ratio6.41N/A-
Revenue-89.29B282K-31,664,538%
Total CashN/A6.38M-
Total DebtN/A206K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNY vs MGHCF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNY
MGHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2286
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
9892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4778
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (81). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (100). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (98). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (78). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (5). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGACX9.61N/A
N/A
Calvert Global Energy Solutions C
MASPX27.90N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Instl
ODIIX113.65N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery R6
BMSBX13.72N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq B
SUGYX12.33N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Global Growth Y

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
-0.82%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
-8.01%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
-7.41%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-11.05%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
-7.38%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.49%
More

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
+1.57%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More