LGGNY
Price
$15.78
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
17.8B
MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNY vs MGHCF

Header iconLGGNY vs MGHCF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNY vs MGHCFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$15.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$138.58K
Capitalization17.8B
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.92K
Capitalization2.05M
LGGNY vs MGHCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNY vs. MGHCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNY is a Hold and MGHCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNY: $15.78 vs. MGHCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: LGGNY and MGHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNY: 382% vs. MGHCF: 318%
Market capitalization -- LGGNY: $17.8B vs. MGHCF: $2.05M
LGGNY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.8B. MGHCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGHCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNY is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGHCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGHCF is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNY.

Price Growth

LGGNY (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.56% price change this week, while MGHCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +17.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNY($17.8B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($2.05M). LGGNY has higher P/E ratio than MGHCF: LGGNY (53.95) vs MGHCF (5.82). MGHCF (18.706) and LGGNY (18.505) have similar YTD gains . LGGNY has higher revenues than MGHCF: LGGNY (18.6B) vs MGHCF (-398.63K).
LGGNYMGHCFLGGNY / MGHCF
Capitalization17.8B2.05M869,990%
EBITDAN/A221K-
Gain YTD18.50518.70699%
P/E Ratio53.955.82927%
Revenue18.6B-398.63K-4,666,028%
Total CashN/A5.34M-
Total DebtN/A136K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNY vs MGHCF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNY
MGHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5287
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
9688
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGHCF (92). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew significantly faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (100). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (96). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (59). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (50). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNYMGHCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CC15.090.11
+0.73%
Chemours Company (The)
AGI31.55-0.54
-1.68%
Alamos Gold
CAL14.24-0.71
-4.75%
Caleres
TRUG3.59-0.21
-5.40%
TruGolf Holdings Inc
MLGO8.01-0.49
-5.76%
MicroAlgo Inc

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
-0.06%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and SFFFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and SFFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
-3.83%
SFFFF - MGHCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONEXF - MGHCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MGHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
PNXPF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
MGPUF - MGHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More