Ad is loading...
LGGNY
Price
$13.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
MNGPF
Price
$2.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

LGGNY vs MNGPF

Header iconLGGNY vs MNGPF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNY vs MNGPFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$13.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$136.74K
CapitalizationN/A
Man Group
Price$2.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$242
CapitalizationN/A
LGGNY vs MNGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNY vs. MNGPF commentary
Nov 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNY is a StrongSell and MNGPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LGGNY: $13.92 vs. MNGPF: $2.59)
Brand notoriety: LGGNY and MNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNY: 247% vs. MNGPF: 22%
Market capitalization -- LGGNY: $17.93B vs. MNGPF: $3.94B
LGGNY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.93B. MNGPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNGPF is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LGGNY (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while MNGPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGGNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNY($17.9B) has a higher market cap than MNGPF($3.94B). MNGPF has higher P/E ratio than LGGNY: MNGPF (15.88) vs LGGNY (6.41). LGGNY YTD gains are higher at: -7.255 vs. MNGPF (-8.889). MNGPF has higher revenues than LGGNY: MNGPF (1.17B) vs LGGNY (-89.29B).
LGGNYMNGPFLGGNY / MNGPF
Capitalization17.9B3.94B455%
EBITDAN/A377M-
Gain YTD-7.255-8.88982%
P/E Ratio6.4115.8840%
Revenue-89.29B1.17B-7,645%
Total CashN/A180M-
Total DebtN/A423M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNY vs MNGPF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNY
MNGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7533
SMR RATING
1..100
9658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (12). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNY (75). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNY (96). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (60). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (49). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLEIX15.360.12
+0.79%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
MFWTX17.91-0.04
-0.22%
MFS Global Total Return A
ABIEX8.58-0.03
-0.35%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset I
SIEYX11.41-0.06
-0.52%
Saratoga International Equity A
DEVCX58.00-0.39
-0.67%
Delaware Small Cap Value C

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
+0.87%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
More

MNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGPF and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGPF and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGPF
1D Price
Change %
MNGPF100%
N/A
CG - MNGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
MGPUF - MNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
LGGNY - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
PGPHF - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
MGHCF - MNGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More