LGGNY
Price
$16.79
Change
+$0.22 (+1.33%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.93B
MNGPF
Price
$2.20
Change
+$0.09 (+4.27%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
Ad is loading...

LGGNY vs MNGPF

Header iconLGGNY vs MNGPF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNY vs MNGPFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$16.79
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
Volume$56.3K
Capitalization17.93B
Man Group
Price$2.20
Change+$0.09 (+4.27%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.94B
LGGNY vs MNGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNY vs. MNGPF commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNY is a Buy and MNGPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNY: $16.79 vs. MNGPF: $2.20)
Brand notoriety: LGGNY and MNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNY: 75% vs. MNGPF: 17%
Market capitalization -- LGGNY: $17.93B vs. MNGPF: $3.94B
LGGNY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.93B. MNGPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNY is a better buy in the long-term than MNGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LGGNY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while MNGPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGGNY is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.98% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNY($17.9B) has a higher market cap than MNGPF($3.94B). MNGPF has higher P/E ratio than LGGNY: MNGPF (15.88) vs LGGNY (6.41). LGGNY YTD gains are higher at: 15.873 vs. MNGPF (-12.330). MNGPF has higher revenues than LGGNY: MNGPF (1.17B) vs LGGNY (-89.29B).
LGGNYMNGPFLGGNY / MNGPF
Capitalization17.9B3.94B455%
EBITDAN/A377M-
Gain YTD15.873-12.330-129%
P/E Ratio6.4115.8840%
Revenue-89.29B1.17B-7,645%
Total CashN/A180M-
Total DebtN/A423M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNY vs MNGPF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNY
MNGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3435
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4385
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (12). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (35). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (98). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNGPF (85). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNGPF (95). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew significantly faster than MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPGCX12.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth C
IPMSX18.60N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port S
BTMFX22.85N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Midcap
JDPNX14.28N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value N
MMCFX14.39N/A
N/A
AMG Veritas China N

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
+1.33%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.76%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.64%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
More

MNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGPF and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGPF and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGPF
1D Price
Change %
MNGPF100%
+4.27%
CG - MNGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
MGPUF - MNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
LGGNY - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
PGPHF - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
MGHCF - MNGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More