Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$59.31
Change+$0.69 (+1.18%)
Volume$138
Net Assets560.05M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.85
Change+$0.51 (+1.30%)
Volume$1.76K
Net Assets4.31B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.31B vs. LGH (560M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: RECS (13.634) vs LGH (12.579). LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.579 | 13.634 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 560M | 4.31B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.15 | 707% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 49.00 | 308% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.59 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| TRMB - LGH | 76% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| GS - LGH | 75% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| MS - LGH | 74% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| AMZN - LGH | 73% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| EMR - LGH | 72% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||