Ad is loading...
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$45.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
Volume$27.34K
Net Assets390.66M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$469.2K
Net Assets2.27B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.27B vs. LGH (391M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: RECS (-10.312) vs LGH (-12.694). LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -12.694 | -10.312 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 391M | 2.27B | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.15 | 707% |
| Turnover | 114.00 | 49.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.73 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| CDNS - LGH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LRCX - LGH | 69% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| SNPS - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| TT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AMAT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||