Ad is loading...
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$50.47
Change-$1.31 (-2.53%)
Volume$1.72K
Net Assets458.68M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.47
Change-$0.66 (-1.88%)
Volume$2.5K
Net Assets1.89B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. LGH (459M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: RECS (1.473) vs LGH (-0.557). LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (5 years) vs RECS (5 years). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.557 | 1.473 | -38% |
| Net Assets | 459M | 1.89B | 24% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 45.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 0.55 | 0.89 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| CDNS - LGH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| LRCX - LGH | 69% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| SNPS - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| AMAT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| KLAC - LGH | 66% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.65% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||