Ad is loading...
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$48.10
Change+$0.33 (+0.69%)
Volume$19.52K
Net Assets415.82M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.29 (+0.87%)
Volume$396.89K
Net Assets2.57B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.57B vs. LGH (416M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: RECS (-3.351) vs LGH (-7.624). LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -7.624 | -3.351 | 228% |
| Net Assets | 416M | 2.57B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.15 | 707% |
| Turnover | 114.00 | 49.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.73 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| CDNS - LGH | 70% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| LRCX - LGH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| TT - LGH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| SNPS - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| AMAT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||