Ad is loading...
LGLCX vs VIGRX
LGLCX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts LGLCX vs VIGRX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$33.34
Change-$1.47 (-4.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$181.83
Change-$7.74 (-4.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
LGLCX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLCX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLCX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. LGLCX (5.97B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: VIGRX (0.39) vs LGLCX (0.00). LGLCX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: LGLCX (14 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). LGLCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. VIGRX (5.00). LGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: LGLCX (1500) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. LGLCX (6.49). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 119.59 vs. LGLCX (41.73).
| LGLCX | VIGRX | LGLCX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.17 | 976% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.17 | 976% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.408 | -10.280 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.97B | 261B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 7.98 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.76 | 35.25 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.73 | 119.59 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.81 | 239.56 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...