Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.07
Change+$0.51 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLFX (7.85B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. RGACX (8.67). LGLFX (32.64) and RGACX (32.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.957 | 19.433 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.85B | 340B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 8.67 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.57 | 67.40 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.64 | 32.17 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.71 | 90.41 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement