Ad is loading...
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$45.99
Change+$0.65 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. LGLFX (6.32B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.08) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.09 vs. RGACX (3.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. LGLFX (39.49).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.308 | -2.542 | 327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 284B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.09 | 3.09 | 489% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 32.79 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.49 | 42.06 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.65 | 58.28 | 162% |