Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.07
Change-$2.30 (-3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.95B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.32
Change-$2.65 (-3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.85B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLFX (7.95B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.12 vs. RGACX (9.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.54 vs. LGLFX (30.87).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.628 | 15.738 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.95B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.12 | 9.83 | 357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 131.39 | 72.89 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.87 | 35.54 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.85 | 96.03 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement