Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$60.13
Change+$0.82 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.13B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LGLFX (8.13B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.88 vs. RGACX (14.19). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. LGLFX (28.57).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.475 | 19.586 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.13B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.88 | 14.19 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.89 | 74.27 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.57 | 40.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.54 | 101.32 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement