Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LGLFX (7.73B). LGLFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.74). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.70 vs. RGACX (7.95). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.65 vs. RGACX (15.38).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.264 | 5.901 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.73B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | 7.95 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.02 | 44.93 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.65 | 15.38 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.92 | 101.17 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers