Ad is loading...
LGLFX vs RGAFX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
LGLFX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGAFX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$32.91
Change+$0.27 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$64.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGLFX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 11, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LGLFX (5.43B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGAFX (0.49) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: LGLFX (12 years) vs RGAFX (22 years). LGLFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. RGAFX (31.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: LGLFX (0) vs RGAFX (250). LGLFX (21.93) and RGAFX (21.54) have marching annual gain over last year. LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.64 vs. RGAFX (30.64).
| LGLFX | RGAFX | LGLFX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.34 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.34 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.160 | 30.859 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.43B | 214B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.93 | 21.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.27 | -5.31 | 514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.64 | 30.64 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.78 | 48.27 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...