Ad is loading...
LGLRX vs RGACX
LGLRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLRX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$41.97
Change-$0.28 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
LGLRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLRX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLRX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. LGLRX (6.42B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: RGACX (0.08) vs LGLRX (0.00). LGLRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLRX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLRX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.88 vs. RGACX (2.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. LGLRX (35.30).
| LGLRX | RGACX | LGLRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.371 | -2.667 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.88 | 2.58 | 654% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.42 | 31.70 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.30 | 41.87 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.44 | 58.36 | 143% |