Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLSX vs RGACX
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$51.99
Change-$1.14 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.68B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.55
Change-$1.33 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.81B
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLSX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. LGLSX (7.68B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLSX (0.00). LGLSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLSX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and LGLSX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.52 vs. RGACX (13.49). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.59 vs. LGLSX (35.71).
| LGLSX | RGACX | LGLSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.421 | 10.501 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 320B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.52 | 13.49 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.55 | 44.82 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.71 | 40.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.10 | 77.78 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement