Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLSX vs RGACX
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$53.92
Change+$0.82 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.18
Change+$1.56 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.76B
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLSX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. LGLSX (7.66B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLSX (0.00). LGLSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLSX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and LGLSX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.29 vs. RGACX (14.04). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. LGLSX (29.35).
| LGLSX | RGACX | LGLSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.357 | 14.155 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.66B | 323B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.29 | 14.04 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.55 | 48.43 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.35 | 39.56 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.36 | 104.21 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement